Quadro K2000 vs GTX 750 Ti
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Quadro K2000 | GTX 750 Ti | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 255 | 486 | -47.5% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 21 | 23 | -8.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 11 | 12 | -8.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 5 | 6 | -16.7% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7 | 1.4 | -47.5% |
| VRAM | 2 GB GDDR5 | 2 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 112 | 112 | — |
| TDP (W) | 51 | 60 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $599 | $149 | +302.0% |
- GTX 750 Ti averages 12 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 8% faster.
- Quadro K2000 draws less power (51W vs 60W).
Verdict: Quadro K2000 or GTX 750 Ti?
Quadro K2000 advantages
- Power efficiency (+15%)
GTX 750 Ti advantages
- 1440p gaming (+8%)
- 4K gaming (+17%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+48%)
- Affordability (+75%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Quadro K2000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the GTX 750 Ti if you game at 1440p.
Value for money
GTX 750 Ti delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Quadro K2000 vs GTX 750 Ti: which should you choose?
Quadro K2000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2013, Kepler) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 11 fps at 1440p; launched at $599.
GTX 750 Ti — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2014, Maxwell) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p; launched at $149.
Quadro K2000 vs GTX 750 Ti: GTX 750 Ti is faster for gaming. GTX 750 Ti averages 12 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 8% faster. Quadro K2000 draws less power (51W vs 60W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the GTX 750 Ti averages 12 fps against 11. At 4K (5 vs 6 fps) VRAM (2GB vs 2GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 51 W versus 60 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $599 vs $149, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Quadro K2000 better than the GTX 750 Ti?
GTX 750 Ti is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. GTX 750 Ti averages 12 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 8% faster.
What is the main difference between the Quadro K2000 and the GTX 750 Ti?
GTX 750 Ti averages 12 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 8% faster. Quadro K2000 draws less power (51W vs 60W).
Which is better value?
GTX 750 Ti delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Quadro K2000 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the GTX 750 Ti if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.