Pro WX 9100 vs RX M 5500 XT
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Pro WX 9100 | RX M 5500 XT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 4,301 | 1,547 | +178.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 49 | 30 | +63.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 29 | 16 | +81.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 16 | 8 | +100.0% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 12.3 | 4.4 | +178.1% |
| VRAM | 16 GB HBM2 | 8 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 484 | 224 | +116.1% |
| TDP (W) | 250 | 84 | — |
- Pro WX 9100 averages 29 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 81% faster.
- RX M 5500 XT draws less power (84W vs 250W).
Verdict: Pro WX 9100 or RX M 5500 XT?
Pro WX 9100 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+45%)
- 4K gaming (+50%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+64%)
- Video memory (+50%)
- Memory bandwidth (+54%)
RX M 5500 XT advantages
- Power efficiency (+66%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Pro WX 9100 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the RX M 5500 XT if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Pro WX 9100 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Pro WX 9100 vs RX M 5500 XT: which should you choose?
Pro WX 9100 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Vega) with 16 GB of HBM2, averaging 29 fps at 1440p; launched at $1,599.
RX M 5500 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2019, RDNA 1) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 16 fps at 1440p.
Pro WX 9100 vs RX M 5500 XT: Pro WX 9100 is faster for gaming. Pro WX 9100 averages 29 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 81% faster. RX M 5500 XT draws less power (84W vs 250W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Pro WX 9100 averages 29 fps against 16. At 4K (16 vs 8 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 250 W versus 84 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Pro WX 9100 better than the RX M 5500 XT?
Pro WX 9100 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Pro WX 9100 averages 29 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 81% faster.
What is the main difference between the Pro WX 9100 and the RX M 5500 XT?
Pro WX 9100 averages 29 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 81% faster. RX M 5500 XT draws less power (84W vs 250W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Pro WX 9100 if you game at 1440p. Choose the RX M 5500 XT if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.