Graphics Card Comparison

Pro WX 9100 vs RTX 2080 Max-Q

Verdict
Pro WX 9100 vs RTX 2080 Max-Q: Pro WX 9100 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricPro WX 9100RTX 2080 Max-QDifference
3DMark Time Spy4,3012,467+74.3%
Avg FPS @ 1080p4936+36.1%
Avg FPS @ 1440p2920+45.0%
Avg FPS @ 4K1611+45.5%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)12.37.1+74.3%
VRAM16 GB HBM28 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)484448+8.0%
TDP (W)25096
  • Pro WX 9100 averages 29 fps at 1440p versus 20 fps — about 45% faster.
  • RTX 2080 Max-Q draws less power (96W vs 250W).

Verdict: Pro WX 9100 or RTX 2080 Max-Q?

Our recommendation
Pro WX 9100 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

Pro WX 9100 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+31%)
  • 4K gaming (+31%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+43%)
  • Video memory (+50%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+7%)

RTX 2080 Max-Q advantages

  • Power efficiency (+62%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Pro WX 9100 if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the RTX 2080 Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the Pro WX 9100 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

Pro WX 9100 vs RTX 2080 Max-Q: which should you choose?

Pro WX 9100 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Vega) with 16 GB of HBM2, averaging 29 fps at 1440p; launched at $1,599.

RTX 2080 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2018, Turing) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 20 fps at 1440p.

Pro WX 9100 vs RTX 2080 Max-Q: Pro WX 9100 is faster for gaming. Pro WX 9100 averages 29 fps at 1440p versus 20 fps — about 45% faster. RTX 2080 Max-Q draws less power (96W vs 250W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Pro WX 9100 averages 29 fps against 20. At 4K (16 vs 11 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 250 W versus 96 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Pro WX 9100 better than the RTX 2080 Max-Q?

Pro WX 9100 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Pro WX 9100 averages 29 fps at 1440p versus 20 fps — about 45% faster.

What is the main difference between the Pro WX 9100 and the RTX 2080 Max-Q?

Pro WX 9100 averages 29 fps at 1440p versus 20 fps — about 45% faster. RTX 2080 Max-Q draws less power (96W vs 250W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the Pro WX 9100 if you game at 1440p. Choose the RTX 2080 Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Pro WX 9100 profile → RTX 2080 Max-Q profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons