Pro WX 9100 vs Pro WX 8200
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Pro WX 9100 | Pro WX 8200 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 4,301 | 3,762 | +14.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 49 | 45 | +8.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 29 | 26 | +11.5% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 16 | 14 | +14.3% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 12.3 | 10.8 | +14.3% |
| VRAM | 16 GB HBM2 | 8 GB HBM2 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 484 | 512 | -5.5% |
| TDP (W) | 250 | 230 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $1,599 | $999 | +60.1% |
- Pro WX 9100 averages 29 fps at 1440p versus 26 fps — about 12% faster.
- Pro WX 8200 draws less power (230W vs 250W).
Verdict: Pro WX 9100 or Pro WX 8200?
Pro WX 9100 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+10%)
- 4K gaming (+13%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+13%)
- Video memory (+50%)
Pro WX 8200 advantages
- Memory bandwidth (+5%)
- Power efficiency (+8%)
- Affordability (+38%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Pro WX 9100 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Pro WX 8200 if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
- Choose the Pro WX 9100 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Value for money
Pro WX 8200 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Pro WX 9100 vs Pro WX 8200: which should you choose?
Pro WX 9100 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Vega) with 16 GB of HBM2, averaging 29 fps at 1440p; launched at $1,599.
Pro WX 8200 — AMD desktop graphics card (2018, Vega) with 8 GB of HBM2, averaging 26 fps at 1440p; launched at $999.
Pro WX 9100 vs Pro WX 8200: Pro WX 9100 is faster for gaming. Pro WX 9100 averages 29 fps at 1440p versus 26 fps — about 12% faster. Pro WX 8200 draws less power (230W vs 250W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Pro WX 9100 averages 29 fps against 26. At 4K (16 vs 14 fps) VRAM (16GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 250 W versus 230 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $1,599 vs $999, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Pro WX 9100 better than the Pro WX 8200?
Pro WX 9100 takes the overall edge, though Pro WX 8200 wins in specific areas worth weighing. Pro WX 9100 averages 29 fps at 1440p versus 26 fps — about 12% faster.
What is the main difference between the Pro WX 9100 and the Pro WX 8200?
Pro WX 9100 averages 29 fps at 1440p versus 26 fps — about 12% faster. Pro WX 8200 draws less power (230W vs 250W).
Which is better value?
Pro WX 8200 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Pro WX 9100 if you game at 1440p. Choose the Pro WX 8200 if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.