Pro WX 8200 vs Pro WX 7100
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Pro WX 8200 | Pro WX 7100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 3,762 | 2,005 | +87.6% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 45 | 33 | +36.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 26 | 18 | +44.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 14 | 10 | +40.0% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 10.8 | 5.7 | +87.6% |
| VRAM | 8 GB HBM2 | 8 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 512 | 224 | +128.6% |
| TDP (W) | 230 | 130 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $999 | $799 | +25.0% |
- Pro WX 8200 averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 44% faster.
- Pro WX 7100 draws less power (130W vs 230W).
Verdict: Pro WX 8200 or Pro WX 7100?
Pro WX 8200 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+31%)
- 4K gaming (+29%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+47%)
- Memory bandwidth (+56%)
Pro WX 7100 advantages
- Power efficiency (+43%)
- Affordability (+20%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Pro WX 8200 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Pro WX 7100 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Pro WX 8200 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Value for money
Pro WX 8200 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Pro WX 8200 vs Pro WX 7100: which should you choose?
Pro WX 8200 — AMD desktop graphics card (2018, Vega) with 8 GB of HBM2, averaging 26 fps at 1440p; launched at $999.
Pro WX 7100 — AMD desktop graphics card (2016, Polaris) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 18 fps at 1440p; launched at $799.
Pro WX 8200 vs Pro WX 7100: Pro WX 8200 is faster for gaming. Pro WX 8200 averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 44% faster. Pro WX 7100 draws less power (130W vs 230W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Pro WX 8200 averages 26 fps against 18. At 4K (14 vs 10 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 230 W versus 130 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $999 vs $799, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Pro WX 8200 better than the Pro WX 7100?
Pro WX 8200 takes the overall edge, though Pro WX 7100 wins in specific areas worth weighing. Pro WX 8200 averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 44% faster.
What is the main difference between the Pro WX 8200 and the Pro WX 7100?
Pro WX 8200 averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 44% faster. Pro WX 7100 draws less power (130W vs 230W).
Which is better value?
Pro WX 8200 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Pro WX 8200 if you game at 1440p. Choose the Pro WX 7100 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.