Pro WX 8200 vs Arc B750
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Pro WX 8200 | Arc B750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 3,762 | 7,224 | -47.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 45 | 68 | -33.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 26 | 41 | -36.6% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 14 | 23 | -39.1% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 10.8 | 17.2 | -37.5% |
| VRAM | 8 GB HBM2 | 16 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 512 | 448 | +14.3% |
| TDP (W) | 230 | 225 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $999 | $349 | +186.2% |
- Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 26 fps — about 37% faster.
- Arc B750 draws less power (225W vs 230W).
Verdict: Pro WX 8200 or Arc B750?
Pro WX 8200 advantages
- Memory bandwidth (+13%)
Arc B750 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+37%)
- 4K gaming (+39%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+48%)
- Video memory (+50%)
- Affordability (+65%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Pro WX 8200 if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
- Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 1440p.
Value for money
Arc B750 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Pro WX 8200 vs Arc B750: which should you choose?
Pro WX 8200 — AMD desktop graphics card (2018, Vega) with 8 GB of HBM2, averaging 26 fps at 1440p; launched at $999.
Arc B750 — Intel desktop graphics card (2025, Battlemage) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 41 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.
Pro WX 8200 vs Arc B750: Arc B750 is faster for gaming. Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 26 fps — about 37% faster. Arc B750 draws less power (225W vs 230W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc B750 averages 41 fps against 26. At 4K (14 vs 23 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 230 W versus 225 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $999 vs $349, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Pro WX 8200 better than the Arc B750?
Arc B750 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 26 fps — about 37% faster.
What is the main difference between the Pro WX 8200 and the Arc B750?
Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 26 fps — about 37% faster. Arc B750 draws less power (225W vs 230W).
Which is better value?
Arc B750 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Pro WX 8200 if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads. Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.