Graphics Card Comparison

Pro WX 7100 vs RX M 9070 XT

Verdict
Pro WX 7100 vs RX M 9070 XT: RX M 9070 XT is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricPro WX 7100RX M 9070 XTDifference
3DMark Time Spy2,0058,038-75.1%
Avg FPS @ 1080p3373-54.8%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1844-59.1%
Avg FPS @ 4K1025-60.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)5.719.1-70.1%
VRAM8 GB GDDR516 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)224448-50.0%
TDP (W)130169
  • RX M 9070 XT averages 44 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 59% faster.
  • Pro WX 7100 draws less power (130W vs 169W).

Verdict: Pro WX 7100 or RX M 9070 XT?

Our recommendation
RX M 9070 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

Pro WX 7100 advantages

  • Power efficiency (+23%)

RX M 9070 XT advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+59%)
  • 4K gaming (+60%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+75%)
  • Video memory (+50%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+50%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Pro WX 7100 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the RX M 9070 XT if you game at 1440p.

Pro WX 7100 vs RX M 9070 XT: which should you choose?

Pro WX 7100 — AMD desktop graphics card (2016, Polaris) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 18 fps at 1440p; launched at $799.

RX M 9070 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2025, RDNA 4) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 44 fps at 1440p.

Pro WX 7100 vs RX M 9070 XT: RX M 9070 XT is faster for gaming. RX M 9070 XT averages 44 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 59% faster. Pro WX 7100 draws less power (130W vs 169W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 9070 XT averages 44 fps against 18. At 4K (10 vs 25 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 130 W versus 169 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Pro WX 7100 better than the RX M 9070 XT?

RX M 9070 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M 9070 XT averages 44 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 59% faster.

What is the main difference between the Pro WX 7100 and the RX M 9070 XT?

RX M 9070 XT averages 44 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 59% faster. Pro WX 7100 draws less power (130W vs 169W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the Pro WX 7100 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX M 9070 XT if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Pro WX 7100 profile → RX M 9070 XT profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons