Pro WX 7100 vs R9 270X
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Pro WX 7100 | R9 270X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 2,005 | 941 | +113.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 33 | 26 | +26.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 18 | 14 | +28.6% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 10 | 7 | +42.9% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 5.7 | 2.7 | +113.0% |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR5 | 2 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 224 | — |
| TDP (W) | 130 | 180 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $799 | $199 | +301.5% |
- Pro WX 7100 averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 29% faster.
- Pro WX 7100 draws less power (130W vs 180W).
Verdict: Pro WX 7100 or R9 270X?
Pro WX 7100 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+22%)
- 4K gaming (+30%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+53%)
- Video memory (+75%)
- Power efficiency (+28%)
R9 270X advantages
- Affordability (+75%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Pro WX 7100 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the R9 270X if you want the better price for the performance.
- Choose the Pro WX 7100 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Value for money
R9 270X delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Pro WX 7100 vs R9 270X: which should you choose?
Pro WX 7100 — AMD desktop graphics card (2016, Polaris) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 18 fps at 1440p; launched at $799.
R9 270X — AMD desktop graphics card (2013, GCN 1.0) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 14 fps at 1440p; launched at $199.
Pro WX 7100 vs R9 270X: Pro WX 7100 is faster for gaming. Pro WX 7100 averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 29% faster. Pro WX 7100 draws less power (130W vs 180W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Pro WX 7100 averages 18 fps against 14. At 4K (10 vs 7 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 2GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 130 W versus 180 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $799 vs $199, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Pro WX 7100 better than the R9 270X?
Pro WX 7100 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Pro WX 7100 averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 29% faster.
What is the main difference between the Pro WX 7100 and the R9 270X?
Pro WX 7100 averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 29% faster. Pro WX 7100 draws less power (130W vs 180W).
Which is better value?
R9 270X delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Pro WX 7100 if you game at 1440p. Choose the R9 270X if you want the better price for the performance.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.