Pro WX 5100 vs HD 7950
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Pro WX 5100 | HD 7950 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,368 | 1,067 | +28.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 28 | 27 | +3.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 15 | 14 | +7.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 8 | 7 | +14.3% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 3.9 | 3.1 | +28.2% |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR5 | 3 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 160 | 336 | -52.4% |
| TDP (W) | 75 | 200 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $399 | $449 | -11.1% |
- Pro WX 5100 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 7% faster.
- Pro WX 5100 draws less power (75W vs 200W).
Verdict: Pro WX 5100 or HD 7950?
Pro WX 5100 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+7%)
- 4K gaming (+13%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+22%)
- Video memory (+63%)
- Power efficiency (+63%)
- Affordability (+11%)
HD 7950 advantages
- Memory bandwidth (+52%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Pro WX 5100 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the HD 7950 if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
- Choose the Pro WX 5100 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Value for money
Pro WX 5100 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Pro WX 5100 vs HD 7950: which should you choose?
Pro WX 5100 — AMD desktop graphics card (2016, Polaris) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 15 fps at 1440p; launched at $399.
HD 7950 — AMD desktop graphics card (2012, GCN 1.0) with 3 GB of GDDR5, averaging 14 fps at 1440p; launched at $449.
Pro WX 5100 vs HD 7950: Pro WX 5100 is faster for gaming. Pro WX 5100 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 7% faster. Pro WX 5100 draws less power (75W vs 200W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Pro WX 5100 averages 15 fps against 14. At 4K (8 vs 7 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 3GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 75 W versus 200 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $399 vs $449, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Pro WX 5100 better than the HD 7950?
Pro WX 5100 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Pro WX 5100 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 7% faster.
What is the main difference between the Pro WX 5100 and the HD 7950?
Pro WX 5100 averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 7% faster. Pro WX 5100 draws less power (75W vs 200W).
Which is better value?
Pro WX 5100 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Pro WX 5100 if you game at 1440p. Choose the HD 7950 if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.