Pro WX 5100 vs Arc B750
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Pro WX 5100 | Arc B750 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,368 | 7,224 | -81.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 28 | 68 | -58.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 15 | 41 | -63.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 8 | 23 | -65.2% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 3.9 | 17.2 | -77.3% |
| VRAM | 8 GB GDDR5 | 16 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 160 | 448 | -64.3% |
| TDP (W) | 75 | 225 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $399 | $349 | +14.3% |
- Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 63% faster.
- Pro WX 5100 draws less power (75W vs 225W).
Verdict: Pro WX 5100 or Arc B750?
Pro WX 5100 advantages
- Power efficiency (+67%)
Arc B750 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+63%)
- 4K gaming (+65%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+81%)
- Video memory (+50%)
- Memory bandwidth (+64%)
- Affordability (+13%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Pro WX 5100 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 1440p.
Value for money
Arc B750 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Pro WX 5100 vs Arc B750: which should you choose?
Pro WX 5100 — AMD desktop graphics card (2016, Polaris) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 15 fps at 1440p; launched at $399.
Arc B750 — Intel desktop graphics card (2025, Battlemage) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 41 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.
Pro WX 5100 vs Arc B750: Arc B750 is faster for gaming. Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 63% faster. Pro WX 5100 draws less power (75W vs 225W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc B750 averages 41 fps against 15. At 4K (8 vs 23 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 75 W versus 225 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $399 vs $349, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Pro WX 5100 better than the Arc B750?
Arc B750 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 63% faster.
What is the main difference between the Pro WX 5100 and the Arc B750?
Arc B750 averages 41 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 63% faster. Pro WX 5100 draws less power (75W vs 225W).
Which is better value?
Arc B750 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Pro WX 5100 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the Arc B750 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.