Graphics Card Comparison

Pro WX 4100 vs RX M 570

Verdict
Pro WX 4100 vs RX M 570: RX M 570 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricPro WX 4100RX M 570Difference
3DMark Time Spy8611,515-43.2%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2530-16.7%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1316-18.8%
Avg FPS @ 4K78-12.5%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)2.54.3-43.2%
VRAM4 GB GDDR54 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)112224-50.0%
TDP (W)5097
  • RX M 570 averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 19% faster.
  • Pro WX 4100 draws less power (50W vs 97W).

Verdict: Pro WX 4100 or RX M 570?

Our recommendation
RX M 570 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

Pro WX 4100 advantages

  • Power efficiency (+48%)

RX M 570 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+19%)
  • 4K gaming (+13%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+43%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+50%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the Pro WX 4100 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the RX M 570 if you game at 1440p.

Pro WX 4100 vs RX M 570: which should you choose?

Pro WX 4100 — AMD desktop graphics card (2016, Polaris) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p; launched at $399.

RX M 570 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Polaris) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 16 fps at 1440p.

Pro WX 4100 vs RX M 570: RX M 570 is faster for gaming. RX M 570 averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 19% faster. Pro WX 4100 draws less power (50W vs 97W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 570 averages 16 fps against 13. At 4K (7 vs 8 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 50 W versus 97 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the Pro WX 4100 better than the RX M 570?

RX M 570 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M 570 averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 19% faster.

What is the main difference between the Pro WX 4100 and the RX M 570?

RX M 570 averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 19% faster. Pro WX 4100 draws less power (50W vs 97W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the Pro WX 4100 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX M 570 if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
Pro WX 4100 profile → RX M 570 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons