Pro WX 4100 vs Quadro P2000
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Pro WX 4100 | Quadro P2000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 861 | 1,053 | -18.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 25 | 27 | -7.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 13 | 14 | -7.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 7 | 7 | — |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 2.5 | 3.0 | -18.3% |
| VRAM | 4 GB GDDR5 | 5 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 112 | 140 | -20.0% |
| TDP (W) | 50 | 75 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $399 | $450 | -11.3% |
- Quadro P2000 averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 7% faster.
- Pro WX 4100 draws less power (50W vs 75W).
Verdict: Pro WX 4100 or Quadro P2000?
Pro WX 4100 advantages
- Power efficiency (+33%)
- Affordability (+11%)
Quadro P2000 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+7%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+18%)
- Video memory (+20%)
- Memory bandwidth (+20%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Pro WX 4100 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Quadro P2000 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Pro WX 4100 if you want the better price for the performance.
Value for money
Quadro P2000 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Pro WX 4100 vs Quadro P2000: which should you choose?
Pro WX 4100 — AMD desktop graphics card (2016, Polaris) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p; launched at $399.
Quadro P2000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2017, Pascal) with 5 GB of GDDR5, averaging 14 fps at 1440p; launched at $450.
Pro WX 4100 vs Quadro P2000: Quadro P2000 is faster for gaming. Quadro P2000 averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 7% faster. Pro WX 4100 draws less power (50W vs 75W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Quadro P2000 averages 14 fps against 13. At 4K (7 vs 7 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 5GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 50 W versus 75 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $399 vs $450, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Pro WX 4100 better than the Quadro P2000?
Quadro P2000 takes the overall edge, though Pro WX 4100 wins in specific areas worth weighing. Quadro P2000 averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 7% faster.
What is the main difference between the Pro WX 4100 and the Quadro P2000?
Quadro P2000 averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 7% faster. Pro WX 4100 draws less power (50W vs 75W).
Which is better value?
Quadro P2000 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the Pro WX 4100 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the Quadro P2000 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.