Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs RX M 460
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | RX M 460 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,650 | 640 | +157.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 25 | 24 | +4.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 12 | 12 | — |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 5 | 6 | -16.7% |
| VRAM | 0 MB Shared | 2 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 68 | 112 | -39.0% |
| TDP (W) | 15 | 48 | — |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU averages 12 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 0% faster.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 48W).
Verdict: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU or RX M 460?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU advantages
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+61%)
- Power efficiency (+69%)
RX M 460 advantages
- 4K gaming (+17%)
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+39%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU if you want the higher benchmark performance overall.
- Choose the RX M 460 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
- Choose the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs RX M 460: which should you choose?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU — Intel integrated graphics processor (2020, Gen 12.1) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 12 fps at 1440p.
RX M 460 — AMD desktop graphics card (2016, Polaris) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs RX M 460: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU is faster for gaming. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU averages 12 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 0% faster. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 48W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU averages 12 fps against 12. At 4K (5 vs 6 fps) VRAM (0MB vs 2GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 15 W versus 48 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU better than the RX M 460?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU averages 12 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 0% faster.
What is the main difference between the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU and the RX M 460?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU averages 12 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 0% faster. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 48W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU if you want the higher benchmark performance overall. Choose the RX M 460 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.