Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,650 | 6,544 | -74.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 25 | 63 | -60.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 12 | 38 | -68.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 5 | 21 | -76.2% |
| VRAM | 0 MB Shared | 8 GB GDDR6X | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 68 | 672 | -89.8% |
| TDP (W) | 15 | 130 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 0.1 | 6.1 | -98.4% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 2 | 33 | -93.9% |
- RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q averages 38 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 68% faster.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 130W).
Verdict: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU or RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU advantages
- Power efficiency (+88%)
RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q advantages
- 1440p gaming (+68%)
- 4K gaming (+76%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+75%)
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+90%)
- AI image generation (+98%)
- Local LLM inference (+94%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q: which should you choose?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU — Intel integrated graphics processor (2020, Gen 12.1) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 12 fps at 1440p.
RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2021, Ampere) with 8 GB of GDDR6X, averaging 38 fps at 1440p.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q: RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q is faster for gaming. RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q averages 38 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 68% faster. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 130W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q averages 38 fps against 12. At 4K (5 vs 21 fps) VRAM (0MB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q is quicker for AI image generation (6.1 vs 0.1 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (33 vs 2 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 15 W versus 130 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU better than the RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q?
RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q averages 38 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 68% faster.
What is the main difference between the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU and the RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q?
RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q averages 38 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 68% faster. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 130W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RTX 3070 Ti Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.