Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs Arc B580M
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | Arc B580M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,650 | 5,119 | -67.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 25 | 54 | -53.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 12 | 32 | -62.5% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 5 | 17 | -70.6% |
| VRAM | 0 MB Shared | 12 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 68 | 336 | -79.7% |
| TDP (W) | 15 | 114 | — |
| Stable Diffusion (it/s) | 0.1 | 1.8 | -94.4% |
| LLM inference (tokens/s) | 2 | 26 | -92.3% |
- Arc B580M averages 32 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 63% faster.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 114W).
Verdict: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU or Arc B580M?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU advantages
- Power efficiency (+87%)
Arc B580M advantages
- 1440p gaming (+63%)
- 4K gaming (+71%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+68%)
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+80%)
- AI image generation (+94%)
- Local LLM inference (+92%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Arc B580M if you game at 1440p.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs Arc B580M: which should you choose?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU — Intel integrated graphics processor (2020, Gen 12.1) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 12 fps at 1440p.
Arc B580M — Intel desktop graphics card (2024, Battlemage) with 12 GB of GDDR6, averaging 32 fps at 1440p.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU vs Arc B580M: Arc B580M is faster for gaming. Arc B580M averages 32 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 63% faster. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 114W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc B580M averages 32 fps against 12. At 4K (5 vs 17 fps) VRAM (0MB vs 12GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
AI and creator workloads
Beyond gaming, the Arc B580M is quicker for AI image generation (1.8 vs 0.1 it/s in Stable Diffusion) and local LLM inference (26 vs 2 tokens/s), which increasingly matters for creators and developers.
Power and value
Board power is 15 W versus 114 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU better than the Arc B580M?
Arc B580M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Arc B580M averages 32 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 63% faster.
What is the main difference between the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU and the Arc B580M?
Arc B580M averages 32 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 63% faster. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 114W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the Arc B580M if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.