H100 SXM5 vs RX M 570
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | H100 SXM5 | RX M 570 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 4.2 | 4.3 | -3.0% |
| VRAM | 80 GB HBM3 | 4 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 3,350 | 224 | +1,395.5% |
| TDP (W) | 700 | 97 | — |
- RX M 570 offers 4.3 TFLOPS of FP32 compute versus 4.2. These cards span different eras or segments, so modern gaming benchmarks are not directly comparable — judge them within their own generation and use case.
Verdict: H100 SXM5 or RX M 570?
H100 SXM5 advantages
- Video memory (+95%)
- Memory bandwidth (+93%)
RX M 570 advantages
- Power efficiency (+86%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the H100 SXM5 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
- Choose the RX M 570 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the H100 SXM5 if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
H100 SXM5 vs RX M 570: which should you choose?
H100 SXM5 — NVIDIA server graphics card (2022, Hopper) with 80 GB of HBM3; launched at $30,000.
RX M 570 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Polaris) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 16 fps at 1440p.
H100 SXM5 vs RX M 570: RX M 570 has more raw compute. RX M 570 offers 4.3 TFLOPS of FP32 compute versus 4.2. These cards span different eras or segments, so modern gaming benchmarks are not directly comparable — judge them within their own generation and use case.
Different eras, different missions
These two parts do not compete head-to-head: H100 SXM5 (2022, Server) and RX M 570 (2017, Desktop) come from different generations or market segments, so modern game benchmarks do not apply to both. The specification table above is best read as architectural context — process node, memory technology and power budgets show how far GPU design has moved.
Specifications at a glance
H100 SXM5 carries 80 GB of HBM3 against 4 GB of GDDR5 on RX M 570, with board powers of 700 W and 97 W respectively.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the H100 SXM5 better than the RX M 570?
H100 SXM5 takes the overall edge, though RX M 570 wins in specific areas worth weighing. RX M 570 offers 4.3 TFLOPS of FP32 compute versus 4.2. These cards span different eras or segments, so modern gaming benchmarks are not directly comparable — judge them within their own generation and use case.
What is the main difference between the H100 SXM5 and the RX M 570?
RX M 570 offers 4.3 TFLOPS of FP32 compute versus 4.2. These cards span different eras or segments, so modern gaming benchmarks are not directly comparable — judge them within their own generation and use case.
Which should I choose?
Choose the H100 SXM5 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work. Choose the RX M 570 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.