H100 SXM5 vs R7 260X
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | H100 SXM5 | R7 260X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 4.2 | 2.0 | +113.2% |
| VRAM | 80 GB HBM3 | 2 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 3,350 | 112 | +2,891.1% |
| TDP (W) | 700 | 115 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $30,000 | $139 | +21,482.7% |
- H100 SXM5 offers 4.2 TFLOPS of FP32 compute versus 2.0. These cards span different eras or segments, so modern gaming benchmarks are not directly comparable — judge them within their own generation and use case.
Verdict: H100 SXM5 or R7 260X?
H100 SXM5 advantages
- Video memory (+98%)
- Memory bandwidth (+97%)
R7 260X advantages
- Power efficiency (+84%)
- Affordability (+100%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the H100 SXM5 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
- Choose the R7 260X if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the H100 SXM5 if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
H100 SXM5 vs R7 260X: which should you choose?
H100 SXM5 — NVIDIA server graphics card (2022, Hopper) with 80 GB of HBM3; launched at $30,000.
R7 260X — AMD desktop graphics card (2013, GCN 2.0) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p; launched at $139.
H100 SXM5 vs R7 260X: H100 SXM5 has more raw compute. H100 SXM5 offers 4.2 TFLOPS of FP32 compute versus 2.0. These cards span different eras or segments, so modern gaming benchmarks are not directly comparable — judge them within their own generation and use case.
Different eras, different missions
These two parts do not compete head-to-head: H100 SXM5 (2022, Server) and R7 260X (2013, Desktop) come from different generations or market segments, so modern game benchmarks do not apply to both. The specification table above is best read as architectural context — process node, memory technology and power budgets show how far GPU design has moved.
Specifications at a glance
H100 SXM5 carries 80 GB of HBM3 against 2 GB of GDDR5 on R7 260X, with board powers of 700 W and 115 W respectively.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the H100 SXM5 better than the R7 260X?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. H100 SXM5 offers 4.2 TFLOPS of FP32 compute versus 2.0. These cards span different eras or segments, so modern gaming benchmarks are not directly comparable — judge them within their own generation and use case.
What is the main difference between the H100 SXM5 and the R7 260X?
H100 SXM5 offers 4.2 TFLOPS of FP32 compute versus 2.0. These cards span different eras or segments, so modern gaming benchmarks are not directly comparable — judge them within their own generation and use case.
Which should I choose?
Choose the H100 SXM5 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work. Choose the R7 260X if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.