H100 SXM5 vs GTX 750 Mobile
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | H100 SXM5 | GTX 750 Mobile | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 4.2 | 0.9 | +346.8% |
| VRAM | 80 GB HBM3 | 1 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 3,350 | 112 | +2,891.1% |
| TDP (W) | 700 | 33 | — |
- H100 SXM5 offers 4.2 TFLOPS of FP32 compute versus 0.9. These cards span different eras or segments, so modern gaming benchmarks are not directly comparable — judge them within their own generation and use case.
Verdict: H100 SXM5 or GTX 750 Mobile?
H100 SXM5 advantages
- Video memory (+99%)
- Memory bandwidth (+97%)
GTX 750 Mobile advantages
- Power efficiency (+95%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the H100 SXM5 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
- Choose the GTX 750 Mobile if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the H100 SXM5 if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
H100 SXM5 vs GTX 750 Mobile: which should you choose?
H100 SXM5 — NVIDIA server graphics card (2022, Hopper) with 80 GB of HBM3; launched at $30,000.
GTX 750 Mobile — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2014, Maxwell) with 1 GB of GDDR5, averaging 11 fps at 1440p.
H100 SXM5 vs GTX 750 Mobile: H100 SXM5 has more raw compute. H100 SXM5 offers 4.2 TFLOPS of FP32 compute versus 0.9. These cards span different eras or segments, so modern gaming benchmarks are not directly comparable — judge them within their own generation and use case.
Different eras, different missions
These two parts do not compete head-to-head: H100 SXM5 (2022, Server) and GTX 750 Mobile (2014, Laptop) come from different generations or market segments, so modern game benchmarks do not apply to both. The specification table above is best read as architectural context — process node, memory technology and power budgets show how far GPU design has moved.
Specifications at a glance
H100 SXM5 carries 80 GB of HBM3 against 1 GB of GDDR5 on GTX 750 Mobile, with board powers of 700 W and 33 W respectively.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the H100 SXM5 better than the GTX 750 Mobile?
H100 SXM5 takes the overall edge, though GTX 750 Mobile wins in specific areas worth weighing. H100 SXM5 offers 4.2 TFLOPS of FP32 compute versus 0.9. These cards span different eras or segments, so modern gaming benchmarks are not directly comparable — judge them within their own generation and use case.
What is the main difference between the H100 SXM5 and the GTX 750 Mobile?
H100 SXM5 offers 4.2 TFLOPS of FP32 compute versus 0.9. These cards span different eras or segments, so modern gaming benchmarks are not directly comparable — judge them within their own generation and use case.
Which should I choose?
Choose the H100 SXM5 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work. Choose the GTX 750 Mobile if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.