GTX 980 vs Quadro M4000
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GTX 980 | Quadro M4000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,743 | 899 | +93.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 31 | 25 | +24.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 17 | 13 | +30.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 9 | 7 | +28.6% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 5.0 | 2.6 | +93.8% |
| VRAM | 4 GB GDDR5 | 8 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 224 | — |
| TDP (W) | 165 | 120 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $549 | $1,050 | -47.7% |
- GTX 980 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 31% faster.
- Quadro M4000 draws less power (120W vs 165W).
Verdict: GTX 980 or Quadro M4000?
GTX 980 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+24%)
- 4K gaming (+22%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+48%)
- Affordability (+48%)
Quadro M4000 advantages
- Video memory (+50%)
- Power efficiency (+27%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GTX 980 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Quadro M4000 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
- Choose the GTX 980 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Value for money
GTX 980 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
GTX 980 vs Quadro M4000: which should you choose?
GTX 980 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2014, Maxwell) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 17 fps at 1440p; launched at $549.
Quadro M4000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2015, Maxwell) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p; launched at $1,050.
GTX 980 vs Quadro M4000: GTX 980 is faster for gaming. GTX 980 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 31% faster. Quadro M4000 draws less power (120W vs 165W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the GTX 980 averages 17 fps against 13. At 4K (9 vs 7 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 165 W versus 120 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $549 vs $1,050, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GTX 980 better than the Quadro M4000?
GTX 980 takes the overall edge, though Quadro M4000 wins in specific areas worth weighing. GTX 980 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 31% faster.
What is the main difference between the GTX 980 and the Quadro M4000?
GTX 980 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 31% faster. Quadro M4000 draws less power (120W vs 165W).
Which is better value?
GTX 980 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the GTX 980 if you game at 1440p. Choose the Quadro M4000 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.