Graphics Card Comparison

GTX 970 Max-Q vs RX 6900 XT

Verdict
GTX 970 Max-Q vs RX 6900 XT: RX 6900 XT is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricGTX 970 Max-QRX 6900 XTDifference
3DMark Time Spy9599,676-90.1%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2684-69.0%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1452-73.1%
Avg FPS @ 4K729-75.9%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)2.723.0-88.1%
VRAM4 GB GDDR516 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)224448-50.0%
TDP (W)65300
  • RX 6900 XT averages 52 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 73% faster.
  • GTX 970 Max-Q draws less power (65W vs 300W).

Verdict: GTX 970 Max-Q or RX 6900 XT?

Our recommendation
RX 6900 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

GTX 970 Max-Q advantages

  • Power efficiency (+78%)

RX 6900 XT advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+73%)
  • 4K gaming (+76%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+90%)
  • Video memory (+75%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+50%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX 970 Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the RX 6900 XT if you game at 1440p.

GTX 970 Max-Q vs RX 6900 XT: which should you choose?

GTX 970 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2014, Maxwell) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 14 fps at 1440p.

RX 6900 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2020, RDNA 2) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 52 fps at 1440p; launched at $999.

GTX 970 Max-Q vs RX 6900 XT: RX 6900 XT is faster for gaming. RX 6900 XT averages 52 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 73% faster. GTX 970 Max-Q draws less power (65W vs 300W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX 6900 XT averages 52 fps against 14. At 4K (7 vs 29 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 65 W versus 300 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GTX 970 Max-Q better than the RX 6900 XT?

RX 6900 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX 6900 XT averages 52 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 73% faster.

What is the main difference between the GTX 970 Max-Q and the RX 6900 XT?

RX 6900 XT averages 52 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 73% faster. GTX 970 Max-Q draws less power (65W vs 300W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX 970 Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX 6900 XT if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
GTX 970 Max-Q profile → RX 6900 XT profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons