Graphics Card Comparison

GTX 970 Max-Q vs Quadro K4000

Verdict
GTX 970 Max-Q vs Quadro K4000: GTX 970 Max-Q is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricGTX 970 Max-QQuadro K4000Difference
3DMark Time Spy959434+121.0%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2622+18.2%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1411+27.3%
Avg FPS @ 4K76+16.7%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)2.71.2+121.0%
VRAM4 GB GDDR53 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)224168+33.3%
TDP (W)6580
  • GTX 970 Max-Q averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 27% faster.
  • GTX 970 Max-Q draws less power (65W vs 80W).

Verdict: GTX 970 Max-Q or Quadro K4000?

Our recommendation
GTX 970 Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

GTX 970 Max-Q advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+21%)
  • 4K gaming (+14%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+55%)
  • Video memory (+25%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+25%)
  • Power efficiency (+19%)

Quadro K4000 advantages

  • No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX 970 Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the GTX 970 Max-Q if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

GTX 970 Max-Q vs Quadro K4000: which should you choose?

GTX 970 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2014, Maxwell) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 14 fps at 1440p.

Quadro K4000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2013, Kepler) with 3 GB of GDDR5, averaging 11 fps at 1440p; launched at $1,269.

GTX 970 Max-Q vs Quadro K4000: GTX 970 Max-Q is faster for gaming. GTX 970 Max-Q averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 27% faster. GTX 970 Max-Q draws less power (65W vs 80W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the GTX 970 Max-Q averages 14 fps against 11. At 4K (7 vs 6 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 3GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 65 W versus 80 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GTX 970 Max-Q better than the Quadro K4000?

GTX 970 Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. GTX 970 Max-Q averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 27% faster.

What is the main difference between the GTX 970 Max-Q and the Quadro K4000?

GTX 970 Max-Q averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 27% faster. GTX 970 Max-Q draws less power (65W vs 80W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX 970 Max-Q if you game at 1440p. Choose the GTX 970 Max-Q if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
GTX 970 Max-Q profile → Quadro K4000 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons