Graphics Card Comparison

GTX 970 Max-Q vs Pro WX 4100

Verdict
GTX 970 Max-Q vs Pro WX 4100: GTX 970 Max-Q is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricGTX 970 Max-QPro WX 4100Difference
3DMark Time Spy959861+11.4%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2625+4.0%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1413+7.7%
Avg FPS @ 4K77
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)2.72.5+11.4%
VRAM4 GB GDDR54 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)224112+100.0%
TDP (W)6550
  • GTX 970 Max-Q averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 8% faster.
  • Pro WX 4100 draws less power (50W vs 65W).

Verdict: GTX 970 Max-Q or Pro WX 4100?

Our recommendation
GTX 970 Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

GTX 970 Max-Q advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+7%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+10%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+50%)

Pro WX 4100 advantages

  • Power efficiency (+23%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX 970 Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the Pro WX 4100 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the GTX 970 Max-Q if you want the higher benchmark performance overall.

GTX 970 Max-Q vs Pro WX 4100: which should you choose?

GTX 970 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2014, Maxwell) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 14 fps at 1440p.

Pro WX 4100 — AMD desktop graphics card (2016, Polaris) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p; launched at $399.

GTX 970 Max-Q vs Pro WX 4100: GTX 970 Max-Q is faster for gaming. GTX 970 Max-Q averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 8% faster. Pro WX 4100 draws less power (50W vs 65W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the GTX 970 Max-Q averages 14 fps against 13. At 4K (7 vs 7 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 65 W versus 50 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GTX 970 Max-Q better than the Pro WX 4100?

GTX 970 Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. GTX 970 Max-Q averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 8% faster.

What is the main difference between the GTX 970 Max-Q and the Pro WX 4100?

GTX 970 Max-Q averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 8% faster. Pro WX 4100 draws less power (50W vs 65W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX 970 Max-Q if you game at 1440p. Choose the Pro WX 4100 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
GTX 970 Max-Q profile → Pro WX 4100 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons