GTX 960 Mobile vs RX M 6900 XT
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GTX 960 Mobile | RX M 6900 XT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 717 | 8,223 | -91.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 24 | 74 | -67.6% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 13 | 45 | -71.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 6 | 25 | -76.0% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 2.1 | 19.6 | -89.5% |
| VRAM | 2 GB GDDR5 | 16 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 112 | 448 | -75.0% |
| TDP (W) | 72 | 195 | — |
- RX M 6900 XT averages 45 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 71% faster.
- GTX 960 Mobile draws less power (72W vs 195W).
Verdict: GTX 960 Mobile or RX M 6900 XT?
GTX 960 Mobile advantages
- Power efficiency (+63%)
RX M 6900 XT advantages
- 1440p gaming (+71%)
- 4K gaming (+76%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+91%)
- Video memory (+88%)
- Memory bandwidth (+75%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GTX 960 Mobile if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RX M 6900 XT if you game at 1440p.
GTX 960 Mobile vs RX M 6900 XT: which should you choose?
GTX 960 Mobile — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2015, Maxwell) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p.
RX M 6900 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2020, RDNA 2) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 45 fps at 1440p.
GTX 960 Mobile vs RX M 6900 XT: RX M 6900 XT is faster for gaming. RX M 6900 XT averages 45 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 71% faster. GTX 960 Mobile draws less power (72W vs 195W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 6900 XT averages 45 fps against 13. At 4K (6 vs 25 fps) VRAM (2GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 72 W versus 195 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GTX 960 Mobile better than the RX M 6900 XT?
RX M 6900 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M 6900 XT averages 45 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 71% faster.
What is the main difference between the GTX 960 Mobile and the RX M 6900 XT?
RX M 6900 XT averages 45 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 71% faster. GTX 960 Mobile draws less power (72W vs 195W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the GTX 960 Mobile if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX M 6900 XT if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.