Graphics Card Comparison

GTX 880M vs RX Vega 56

Verdict
GTX 880M vs RX Vega 56: RX Vega 56 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricGTX 880MRX Vega 56Difference
3DMark Time Spy1,0673,688-71.1%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2744-38.6%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1426-46.2%
Avg FPS @ 4K714-50.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)3.110.5-71.1%
VRAM8 GB GDDR58 GB HBM2
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)160410-61.0%
TDP (W)103210
  • RX Vega 56 averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 46% faster.
  • GTX 880M draws less power (103W vs 210W).

Verdict: GTX 880M or RX Vega 56?

Our recommendation
RX Vega 56 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

GTX 880M advantages

  • Power efficiency (+51%)

RX Vega 56 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+46%)
  • 4K gaming (+50%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+71%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+61%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX 880M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the RX Vega 56 if you game at 1440p.

GTX 880M vs RX Vega 56: which should you choose?

GTX 880M — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2014, Kepler) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 14 fps at 1440p.

RX Vega 56 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Vega) with 8 GB of HBM2, averaging 26 fps at 1440p; launched at $399.

GTX 880M vs RX Vega 56: RX Vega 56 is faster for gaming. RX Vega 56 averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 46% faster. GTX 880M draws less power (103W vs 210W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX Vega 56 averages 26 fps against 14. At 4K (7 vs 14 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 103 W versus 210 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GTX 880M better than the RX Vega 56?

RX Vega 56 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX Vega 56 averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 46% faster.

What is the main difference between the GTX 880M and the RX Vega 56?

RX Vega 56 averages 26 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 46% faster. GTX 880M draws less power (103W vs 210W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX 880M if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX Vega 56 if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
GTX 880M profile → RX Vega 56 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons