Graphics Card Comparison

GTX 780 Max-Q vs RX 5300M

Verdict
GTX 780 Max-Q vs RX 5300M: RX 5300M is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricGTX 780 Max-QRX 5300MDifference
3DMark Time Spy1,0151,424-28.7%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2629-10.3%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1416-12.5%
Avg FPS @ 4K78-12.5%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)2.94.1-28.7%
VRAM3 GB GDDR53 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)336168+100.0%
TDP (W)11265
  • RX 5300M averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 13% faster.
  • RX 5300M draws less power (65W vs 112W).

Verdict: GTX 780 Max-Q or RX 5300M?

Our recommendation
RX 5300M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

GTX 780 Max-Q advantages

  • Memory bandwidth (+50%)

RX 5300M advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+13%)
  • 4K gaming (+13%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+29%)
  • Power efficiency (+42%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX 780 Max-Q if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
  • Choose the RX 5300M if you game at 1440p.

GTX 780 Max-Q vs RX 5300M: which should you choose?

GTX 780 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2013, Kepler) with 3 GB of GDDR5, averaging 14 fps at 1440p.

RX 5300M — AMD desktop graphics card (2019, RDNA 1) with 3 GB of GDDR6, averaging 16 fps at 1440p.

GTX 780 Max-Q vs RX 5300M: RX 5300M is faster for gaming. RX 5300M averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 13% faster. RX 5300M draws less power (65W vs 112W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX 5300M averages 16 fps against 14. At 4K (7 vs 8 fps) VRAM (3GB vs 3GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 112 W versus 65 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GTX 780 Max-Q better than the RX 5300M?

RX 5300M is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX 5300M averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 13% faster.

What is the main difference between the GTX 780 Max-Q and the RX 5300M?

RX 5300M averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 13% faster. RX 5300M draws less power (65W vs 112W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX 780 Max-Q if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads. Choose the RX 5300M if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
GTX 780 Max-Q profile → RX 5300M profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons