GTX 750 Ti vs Quadro K4000
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GTX 750 Ti | Quadro K4000 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 486 | 434 | +12.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 23 | 22 | +4.5% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 12 | 11 | +9.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 6 | 6 | — |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 1.4 | 1.2 | +12.1% |
| VRAM | 2 GB GDDR5 | 3 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 112 | 168 | -33.3% |
| TDP (W) | 60 | 80 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $149 | $1,269 | -88.3% |
- GTX 750 Ti averages 12 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 9% faster.
- GTX 750 Ti draws less power (60W vs 80W).
Verdict: GTX 750 Ti or Quadro K4000?
GTX 750 Ti advantages
- 1440p gaming (+8%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+11%)
- Power efficiency (+25%)
- Affordability (+88%)
Quadro K4000 advantages
- Video memory (+33%)
- Memory bandwidth (+33%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GTX 750 Ti if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the Quadro K4000 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
- Choose the GTX 750 Ti if you want the higher benchmark performance overall.
Value for money
GTX 750 Ti delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
GTX 750 Ti vs Quadro K4000: which should you choose?
GTX 750 Ti — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2014, Maxwell) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p; launched at $149.
Quadro K4000 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2013, Kepler) with 3 GB of GDDR5, averaging 11 fps at 1440p; launched at $1,269.
GTX 750 Ti vs Quadro K4000: GTX 750 Ti is faster for gaming. GTX 750 Ti averages 12 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 9% faster. GTX 750 Ti draws less power (60W vs 80W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the GTX 750 Ti averages 12 fps against 11. At 4K (6 vs 6 fps) VRAM (2GB vs 3GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 60 W versus 80 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $149 vs $1,269, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GTX 750 Ti better than the Quadro K4000?
GTX 750 Ti takes the overall edge, though Quadro K4000 wins in specific areas worth weighing. GTX 750 Ti averages 12 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 9% faster.
What is the main difference between the GTX 750 Ti and the Quadro K4000?
GTX 750 Ti averages 12 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 9% faster. GTX 750 Ti draws less power (60W vs 80W).
Which is better value?
GTX 750 Ti delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the GTX 750 Ti if you game at 1440p. Choose the Quadro K4000 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.