Graphics Card Comparison

GTX 750 Ti vs HD 7870

Verdict
GTX 750 Ti vs HD 7870: HD 7870 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricGTX 750 TiHD 7870Difference
3DMark Time Spy486896-45.8%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2325-8.0%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1213-7.7%
Avg FPS @ 4K67-14.3%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)1.42.6-45.7%
VRAM2 GB GDDR52 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)112224-50.0%
TDP (W)60175
Launch MSRP (USD)$149$349-57.3%
  • HD 7870 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster.
  • GTX 750 Ti draws less power (60W vs 175W).

Verdict: GTX 750 Ti or HD 7870?

Our recommendation
HD 7870 takes the overall edge, though GTX 750 Ti wins in specific areas worth weighing.

GTX 750 Ti advantages

  • Power efficiency (+66%)
  • Affordability (+57%)

HD 7870 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+8%)
  • 4K gaming (+14%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+46%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+50%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX 750 Ti if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the HD 7870 if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the GTX 750 Ti if you want the better price for the performance.

Value for money

GTX 750 Ti delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.

GTX 750 Ti vs HD 7870: which should you choose?

GTX 750 Ti — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2014, Maxwell) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p; launched at $149.

HD 7870 — AMD desktop graphics card (2012, GCN 1.0) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.

GTX 750 Ti vs HD 7870: HD 7870 is faster for gaming. HD 7870 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster. GTX 750 Ti draws less power (60W vs 175W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the HD 7870 averages 13 fps against 12. At 4K (6 vs 7 fps) VRAM (2GB vs 2GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 60 W versus 175 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $149 vs $349, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GTX 750 Ti better than the HD 7870?

HD 7870 takes the overall edge, though GTX 750 Ti wins in specific areas worth weighing. HD 7870 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster.

What is the main difference between the GTX 750 Ti and the HD 7870?

HD 7870 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster. GTX 750 Ti draws less power (60W vs 175W).

Which is better value?

GTX 750 Ti delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX 750 Ti if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the HD 7870 if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
GTX 750 Ti profile → HD 7870 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons