Graphics Card Comparison

GTX 750 Mobile vs RX M Vega 56

Verdict
GTX 750 Mobile vs RX M Vega 56: RX M Vega 56 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricGTX 750 MobileRX M Vega 56Difference
3DMark Time Spy3293,136-89.5%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2240-45.0%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1123-52.2%
Avg FPS @ 4K512-58.3%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)0.99.0-89.5%
VRAM1 GB GDDR58 GB HBM2
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)112410-72.7%
TDP (W)33136
  • RX M Vega 56 averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 52% faster.
  • GTX 750 Mobile draws less power (33W vs 136W).

Verdict: GTX 750 Mobile or RX M Vega 56?

Our recommendation
RX M Vega 56 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

GTX 750 Mobile advantages

  • Power efficiency (+76%)

RX M Vega 56 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+52%)
  • 4K gaming (+58%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+90%)
  • Video memory (+88%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+73%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX 750 Mobile if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the RX M Vega 56 if you game at 1440p.

GTX 750 Mobile vs RX M Vega 56: which should you choose?

GTX 750 Mobile — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2014, Maxwell) with 1 GB of GDDR5, averaging 11 fps at 1440p.

RX M Vega 56 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Vega) with 8 GB of HBM2, averaging 23 fps at 1440p.

GTX 750 Mobile vs RX M Vega 56: RX M Vega 56 is faster for gaming. RX M Vega 56 averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 52% faster. GTX 750 Mobile draws less power (33W vs 136W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M Vega 56 averages 23 fps against 11. At 4K (5 vs 12 fps) VRAM (1GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 33 W versus 136 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GTX 750 Mobile better than the RX M Vega 56?

RX M Vega 56 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M Vega 56 averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 52% faster.

What is the main difference between the GTX 750 Mobile and the RX M Vega 56?

RX M Vega 56 averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 52% faster. GTX 750 Mobile draws less power (33W vs 136W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX 750 Mobile if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX M Vega 56 if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
GTX 750 Mobile profile → RX M Vega 56 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons