GTX 750 Mobile vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GTX 750 Mobile | Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 329 | 1,650 | -80.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 22 | 25 | -12.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 11 | 12 | -8.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 5 | 5 | — |
| VRAM | 1 GB GDDR5 | 0 MB Shared | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 112 | 68 | +64.0% |
| TDP (W) | 33 | 15 | — |
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU averages 12 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 8% faster.
- Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 33W).
Verdict: GTX 750 Mobile or Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU?
GTX 750 Mobile advantages
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+39%)
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU advantages
- 1440p gaming (+8%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+80%)
- Power efficiency (+55%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GTX 750 Mobile if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
- Choose the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the GTX 750 Mobile if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
GTX 750 Mobile vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU: which should you choose?
GTX 750 Mobile — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2014, Maxwell) with 1 GB of GDDR5, averaging 11 fps at 1440p.
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU — Intel integrated graphics processor (2020, Gen 12.1) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 12 fps at 1440p.
GTX 750 Mobile vs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU: Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU is faster for gaming. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU averages 12 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 8% faster. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 33W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU averages 12 fps against 11. At 4K (5 vs 5 fps) VRAM (1GB vs 0MB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 33 W versus 15 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GTX 750 Mobile better than the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU takes the overall edge, though GTX 750 Mobile wins in specific areas worth weighing. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU averages 12 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 8% faster.
What is the main difference between the GTX 750 Mobile and the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU?
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU averages 12 fps at 1440p versus 11 fps — about 8% faster. Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU draws less power (15W vs 33W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the GTX 750 Mobile if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work. Choose the Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.