GTX 690 vs RX 6900 XT
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GTX 690 | RX 6900 XT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 2,191 | 9,676 | -77.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 34 | 84 | -59.5% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 19 | 52 | -63.5% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 10 | 29 | -65.5% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 6.3 | 23.0 | -72.8% |
| VRAM | 4 GB GDDR5 | 16 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 448 | 448 | — |
| TDP (W) | 300 | 300 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $999 | $999 | — |
- RX 6900 XT averages 52 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 63% faster.
Verdict: GTX 690 or RX 6900 XT?
GTX 690 advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
RX 6900 XT advantages
- 1440p gaming (+63%)
- 4K gaming (+66%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+77%)
- Video memory (+75%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the RX 6900 XT if you game at 1440p.
Value for money
RX 6900 XT delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
GTX 690 vs RX 6900 XT: which should you choose?
GTX 690 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2012, Kepler) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 19 fps at 1440p; launched at $999.
RX 6900 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2020, RDNA 2) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 52 fps at 1440p; launched at $999.
GTX 690 vs RX 6900 XT: RX 6900 XT is faster for gaming. RX 6900 XT averages 52 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 63% faster.
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX 6900 XT averages 52 fps against 19. At 4K (10 vs 29 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 300 W versus 300 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $999 vs $999, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GTX 690 better than the RX 6900 XT?
RX 6900 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX 6900 XT averages 52 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 63% faster.
What is the main difference between the GTX 690 and the RX 6900 XT?
RX 6900 XT averages 52 fps at 1440p versus 19 fps — about 63% faster.
Which is better value?
RX 6900 XT delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the RX 6900 XT if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.