Graphics Card Comparison

GTX 680 Max-Q vs RTX 4070 Super Mobile

Verdict
GTX 680 Max-Q vs RTX 4070 Super Mobile: RTX 4070 Super Mobile is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricGTX 680 Max-QRTX 4070 Super MobileDifference
3DMark Time Spy79412,060-93.4%
Avg FPS @ 1080p25100-75.0%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1362-79.0%
Avg FPS @ 4K635-82.9%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)2.330.2-92.5%
VRAM2 GB GDDR512 GB GDDR6X
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)224504-55.6%
TDP (W)87132
  • RTX 4070 Super Mobile averages 62 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 79% faster.
  • GTX 680 Max-Q draws less power (87W vs 132W).

Verdict: GTX 680 Max-Q or RTX 4070 Super Mobile?

Our recommendation
RTX 4070 Super Mobile is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

GTX 680 Max-Q advantages

  • Power efficiency (+34%)

RTX 4070 Super Mobile advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+79%)
  • 4K gaming (+83%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+93%)
  • Video memory (+83%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+56%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX 680 Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the RTX 4070 Super Mobile if you game at 1440p.

GTX 680 Max-Q vs RTX 4070 Super Mobile: which should you choose?

GTX 680 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2012, Kepler) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p.

RTX 4070 Super Mobile — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2024, Ada Lovelace) with 12 GB of GDDR6X, averaging 62 fps at 1440p.

GTX 680 Max-Q vs RTX 4070 Super Mobile: RTX 4070 Super Mobile is faster for gaming. RTX 4070 Super Mobile averages 62 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 79% faster. GTX 680 Max-Q draws less power (87W vs 132W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RTX 4070 Super Mobile averages 62 fps against 13. At 4K (6 vs 35 fps) VRAM (2GB vs 12GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 87 W versus 132 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GTX 680 Max-Q better than the RTX 4070 Super Mobile?

RTX 4070 Super Mobile is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RTX 4070 Super Mobile averages 62 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 79% faster.

What is the main difference between the GTX 680 Max-Q and the RTX 4070 Super Mobile?

RTX 4070 Super Mobile averages 62 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 79% faster. GTX 680 Max-Q draws less power (87W vs 132W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX 680 Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RTX 4070 Super Mobile if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
GTX 680 Max-Q profile → RTX 4070 Super Mobile profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons