Graphics Card Comparison

GTX 680 Max-Q vs Radeon 780M

Verdict
GTX 680 Max-Q vs Radeon 780M: Radeon 780M is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricGTX 680 Max-QRadeon 780MDifference
3DMark Time Spy7943,100-74.4%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2545-44.4%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1325-48.0%
Avg FPS @ 4K610-40.0%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)2.30.1+1,646.2%
VRAM2 GB GDDR50 MB Shared
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)224102+118.8%
TDP (W)8715
  • Radeon 780M averages 25 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 48% faster.
  • Radeon 780M draws less power (15W vs 87W).

Verdict: GTX 680 Max-Q or Radeon 780M?

Our recommendation
Radeon 780M takes the overall edge, though GTX 680 Max-Q wins in specific areas worth weighing.

GTX 680 Max-Q advantages

  • Video memory (+100%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+54%)

Radeon 780M advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+48%)
  • 4K gaming (+40%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+74%)
  • Power efficiency (+83%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX 680 Max-Q if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
  • Choose the Radeon 780M if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the GTX 680 Max-Q if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.

GTX 680 Max-Q vs Radeon 780M: which should you choose?

GTX 680 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2012, Kepler) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p.

Radeon 780M — AMD integrated graphics processor (2023, RDNA 3.0) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 25 fps at 1440p.

GTX 680 Max-Q vs Radeon 780M: Radeon 780M is faster for gaming. Radeon 780M averages 25 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 48% faster. Radeon 780M draws less power (15W vs 87W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Radeon 780M averages 25 fps against 13. At 4K (6 vs 10 fps) VRAM (2GB vs 0MB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 87 W versus 15 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GTX 680 Max-Q better than the Radeon 780M?

Radeon 780M takes the overall edge, though GTX 680 Max-Q wins in specific areas worth weighing. Radeon 780M averages 25 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 48% faster.

What is the main difference between the GTX 680 Max-Q and the Radeon 780M?

Radeon 780M averages 25 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 48% faster. Radeon 780M draws less power (15W vs 87W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX 680 Max-Q if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work. Choose the Radeon 780M if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
GTX 680 Max-Q profile → Radeon 780M profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons