GTX 680 Max-Q vs R9 Fury
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GTX 680 Max-Q | R9 Fury | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 794 | 2,509 | -68.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 25 | 36 | -30.6% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 13 | 20 | -35.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 6 | 11 | -45.5% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 2.3 | 7.2 | -68.3% |
| VRAM | 2 GB GDDR5 | 4 GB HBM | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 512 | -56.3% |
| TDP (W) | 87 | 275 | — |
- R9 Fury averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 35% faster.
- GTX 680 Max-Q draws less power (87W vs 275W).
Verdict: GTX 680 Max-Q or R9 Fury?
GTX 680 Max-Q advantages
- Power efficiency (+68%)
R9 Fury advantages
- 1440p gaming (+35%)
- 4K gaming (+45%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+68%)
- Video memory (+50%)
- Memory bandwidth (+56%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GTX 680 Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the R9 Fury if you game at 1440p.
GTX 680 Max-Q vs R9 Fury: which should you choose?
GTX 680 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2012, Kepler) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p.
R9 Fury — AMD desktop graphics card (2015, GCN 3.0) with 4 GB of HBM, averaging 20 fps at 1440p; launched at $549.
GTX 680 Max-Q vs R9 Fury: R9 Fury is faster for gaming. R9 Fury averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 35% faster. GTX 680 Max-Q draws less power (87W vs 275W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the R9 Fury averages 20 fps against 13. At 4K (6 vs 11 fps) VRAM (2GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 87 W versus 275 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GTX 680 Max-Q better than the R9 Fury?
R9 Fury is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. R9 Fury averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 35% faster.
What is the main difference between the GTX 680 Max-Q and the R9 Fury?
R9 Fury averages 20 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 35% faster. GTX 680 Max-Q draws less power (87W vs 275W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the GTX 680 Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the R9 Fury if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.