Graphics Card Comparison

GTX 680 Max-Q vs HD 7870

Verdict
GTX 680 Max-Q vs HD 7870: GTX 680 Max-Q is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricGTX 680 Max-QHD 7870Difference
3DMark Time Spy794896-11.4%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2525
Avg FPS @ 1440p1313
Avg FPS @ 4K67-14.3%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)2.32.6-11.3%
VRAM2 GB GDDR52 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)224224
TDP (W)87175
  • GTX 680 Max-Q averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 0% faster.
  • GTX 680 Max-Q draws less power (87W vs 175W).

Verdict: GTX 680 Max-Q or HD 7870?

Our recommendation
HD 7870 takes the overall edge, though GTX 680 Max-Q wins in specific areas worth weighing.

GTX 680 Max-Q advantages

  • Power efficiency (+50%)

HD 7870 advantages

  • 4K gaming (+14%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+11%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX 680 Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the HD 7870 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

GTX 680 Max-Q vs HD 7870: which should you choose?

GTX 680 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2012, Kepler) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p.

HD 7870 — AMD desktop graphics card (2012, GCN 1.0) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p; launched at $349.

GTX 680 Max-Q vs HD 7870: GTX 680 Max-Q is faster for gaming. GTX 680 Max-Q averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 0% faster. GTX 680 Max-Q draws less power (87W vs 175W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the GTX 680 Max-Q averages 13 fps against 13. At 4K (6 vs 7 fps) VRAM (2GB vs 2GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 87 W versus 175 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GTX 680 Max-Q better than the HD 7870?

HD 7870 takes the overall edge, though GTX 680 Max-Q wins in specific areas worth weighing. GTX 680 Max-Q averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 0% faster.

What is the main difference between the GTX 680 Max-Q and the HD 7870?

GTX 680 Max-Q averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 0% faster. GTX 680 Max-Q draws less power (87W vs 175W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX 680 Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the HD 7870 if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
GTX 680 Max-Q profile → HD 7870 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons