Graphics Card Comparison

GTX 680 Max-Q vs Adreno 830

Verdict
GTX 680 Max-Q vs Adreno 830: Adreno 830 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricGTX 680 Max-QAdreno 830Difference
3DMark Time Spy7942,400-66.9%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2535-28.6%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1318-27.8%
Avg FPS @ 4K65+20.0%
VRAM2 GB GDDR50 MB Shared
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)22485+164.2%
TDP (W)8710
  • Adreno 830 averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 28% faster.
  • Adreno 830 draws less power (10W vs 87W).

Verdict: GTX 680 Max-Q or Adreno 830?

Our recommendation
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay.

GTX 680 Max-Q advantages

  • 4K gaming (+17%)
  • Video memory (+100%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+62%)

Adreno 830 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+28%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+67%)
  • Power efficiency (+89%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX 680 Max-Q if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
  • Choose the Adreno 830 if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the GTX 680 Max-Q if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.

GTX 680 Max-Q vs Adreno 830: which should you choose?

GTX 680 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2012, Kepler) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p.

Adreno 830 — Qualcomm integrated graphics processor (2024, Adreno 800) with 0 MB of Shared, averaging 18 fps at 1440p.

GTX 680 Max-Q vs Adreno 830: Adreno 830 is faster for gaming. Adreno 830 averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 28% faster. Adreno 830 draws less power (10W vs 87W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Adreno 830 averages 18 fps against 13. At 4K (6 vs 5 fps) VRAM (2GB vs 0MB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 87 W versus 10 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GTX 680 Max-Q better than the Adreno 830?

These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. Adreno 830 averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 28% faster.

What is the main difference between the GTX 680 Max-Q and the Adreno 830?

Adreno 830 averages 18 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 28% faster. Adreno 830 draws less power (10W vs 87W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX 680 Max-Q if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display. Choose the Adreno 830 if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
GTX 680 Max-Q profile → Adreno 830 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons