GTX 660 Ti Max-Q vs Voodoo Graphics
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GTX 660 Ti Max-Q | Voodoo Graphics | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| VRAM | 2 GB GDDR5 | 4 MB EDO | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 168 | 0 | +41,900.0% |
| TDP (W) | 67 | 15 | — |
- These GPUs come from different eras (2012 vs 1996), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Verdict: GTX 660 Ti Max-Q or Voodoo Graphics?
GTX 660 Ti Max-Q advantages
- Video memory (+100%)
- Memory bandwidth (+100%)
Voodoo Graphics advantages
- Power efficiency (+78%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GTX 660 Ti Max-Q if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
- Choose the Voodoo Graphics if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the GTX 660 Ti Max-Q if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
GTX 660 Ti Max-Q vs Voodoo Graphics: which should you choose?
GTX 660 Ti Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2012, Kepler) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p.
Voodoo Graphics — 3dfx desktop graphics card (1996, Voodoo 1) with 4 MB of EDO; launched at $299.
GTX 660 Ti Max-Q vs Voodoo Graphics: a cross-generation spec comparison. These GPUs come from different eras (2012 vs 1996), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Different eras, different missions
These two parts do not compete head-to-head: GTX 660 Ti Max-Q (2012, Laptop) and Voodoo Graphics (1996, Desktop) come from different generations or market segments, so modern game benchmarks do not apply to both. The specification table above is best read as architectural context — process node, memory technology and power budgets show how far GPU design has moved.
Specifications at a glance
GTX 660 Ti Max-Q carries 2 GB of GDDR5 against 4 MB of EDO on Voodoo Graphics, with board powers of 67 W and 15 W respectively.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GTX 660 Ti Max-Q better than the Voodoo Graphics?
GTX 660 Ti Max-Q takes the overall edge, though Voodoo Graphics wins in specific areas worth weighing. These GPUs come from different eras (2012 vs 1996), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
What is the main difference between the GTX 660 Ti Max-Q and the Voodoo Graphics?
These GPUs come from different eras (2012 vs 1996), so direct benchmark comparisons are not meaningful. The table shows their specifications side by side for historical and architectural context.
Which should I choose?
Choose the GTX 660 Ti Max-Q if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work. Choose the Voodoo Graphics if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.