Graphics Card Comparison

GTX 660 Max-Q vs RX M 560

Verdict
GTX 660 Max-Q vs RX M 560: RX M 560 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricGTX 660 Max-QRX M 560Difference
3DMark Time Spy486777-37.5%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2325-8.0%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1213-7.7%
Avg FPS @ 4K66
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)1.42.2-37.4%
VRAM2 GB GDDR54 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)168112+50.0%
TDP (W)6352
  • RX M 560 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster.
  • RX M 560 draws less power (52W vs 63W).

Verdict: GTX 660 Max-Q or RX M 560?

Our recommendation
RX M 560 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

GTX 660 Max-Q advantages

  • Memory bandwidth (+33%)

RX M 560 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+8%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+37%)
  • Video memory (+50%)
  • Power efficiency (+17%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX 660 Max-Q if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
  • Choose the RX M 560 if you game at 1440p.

GTX 660 Max-Q vs RX M 560: which should you choose?

GTX 660 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2012, Kepler) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p.

RX M 560 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Polaris) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p.

GTX 660 Max-Q vs RX M 560: RX M 560 is faster for gaming. RX M 560 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster. RX M 560 draws less power (52W vs 63W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 560 averages 13 fps against 12. At 4K (6 vs 6 fps) VRAM (2GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 63 W versus 52 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GTX 660 Max-Q better than the RX M 560?

RX M 560 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M 560 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster.

What is the main difference between the GTX 660 Max-Q and the RX M 560?

RX M 560 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster. RX M 560 draws less power (52W vs 63W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX 660 Max-Q if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads. Choose the RX M 560 if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
GTX 660 Max-Q profile → RX M 560 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons