Graphics Card Comparison

GTX 660 Max-Q vs Pro WX 4100

Verdict
GTX 660 Max-Q vs Pro WX 4100: Pro WX 4100 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricGTX 660 Max-QPro WX 4100Difference
3DMark Time Spy486861-43.6%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2325-8.0%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1213-7.7%
Avg FPS @ 4K67-14.3%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)1.42.5-43.5%
VRAM2 GB GDDR54 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)168112+50.0%
TDP (W)6350
  • Pro WX 4100 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster.
  • Pro WX 4100 draws less power (50W vs 63W).

Verdict: GTX 660 Max-Q or Pro WX 4100?

Our recommendation
Pro WX 4100 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

GTX 660 Max-Q advantages

  • Memory bandwidth (+33%)

Pro WX 4100 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+8%)
  • 4K gaming (+14%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+44%)
  • Video memory (+50%)
  • Power efficiency (+21%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX 660 Max-Q if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
  • Choose the Pro WX 4100 if you game at 1440p.

GTX 660 Max-Q vs Pro WX 4100: which should you choose?

GTX 660 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2012, Kepler) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p.

Pro WX 4100 — AMD desktop graphics card (2016, Polaris) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p; launched at $399.

GTX 660 Max-Q vs Pro WX 4100: Pro WX 4100 is faster for gaming. Pro WX 4100 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster. Pro WX 4100 draws less power (50W vs 63W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Pro WX 4100 averages 13 fps against 12. At 4K (6 vs 7 fps) VRAM (2GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 63 W versus 50 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GTX 660 Max-Q better than the Pro WX 4100?

Pro WX 4100 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Pro WX 4100 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster.

What is the main difference between the GTX 660 Max-Q and the Pro WX 4100?

Pro WX 4100 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 8% faster. Pro WX 4100 draws less power (50W vs 63W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX 660 Max-Q if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads. Choose the Pro WX 4100 if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
GTX 660 Max-Q profile → Pro WX 4100 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons