Graphics Card Comparison

GTX 1660 vs RX M 6950 XT

Verdict
GTX 1660 vs RX M 6950 XT: RX M 6950 XT is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricGTX 1660RX M 6950 XTDifference
3DMark Time Spy1,7608,442-79.2%
Avg FPS @ 1080p3176-59.2%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1746-63.0%
Avg FPS @ 4K926-65.4%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)5.020.1-75.0%
VRAM6 GB GDDR516 GB GDDR6
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)168448-62.5%
TDP (W)120217
  • RX M 6950 XT averages 46 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 63% faster.
  • GTX 1660 draws less power (120W vs 217W).

Verdict: GTX 1660 or RX M 6950 XT?

Our recommendation
RX M 6950 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

GTX 1660 advantages

  • Power efficiency (+45%)

RX M 6950 XT advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+63%)
  • 4K gaming (+65%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+79%)
  • Video memory (+63%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+63%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX 1660 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
  • Choose the RX M 6950 XT if you game at 1440p.

GTX 1660 vs RX M 6950 XT: which should you choose?

GTX 1660 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2019, Turing) with 6 GB of GDDR5, averaging 17 fps at 1440p; launched at $219.

RX M 6950 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2022, RDNA 2) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 46 fps at 1440p.

GTX 1660 vs RX M 6950 XT: RX M 6950 XT is faster for gaming. RX M 6950 XT averages 46 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 63% faster. GTX 1660 draws less power (120W vs 217W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 6950 XT averages 46 fps against 17. At 4K (9 vs 26 fps) VRAM (6GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 120 W versus 217 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GTX 1660 better than the RX M 6950 XT?

RX M 6950 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M 6950 XT averages 46 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 63% faster.

What is the main difference between the GTX 1660 and the RX M 6950 XT?

RX M 6950 XT averages 46 fps at 1440p versus 17 fps — about 63% faster. GTX 1660 draws less power (120W vs 217W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX 1660 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX M 6950 XT if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
GTX 1660 profile → RX M 6950 XT profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons