GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Arc A570M
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | Arc A570M | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,333 | 2,234 | -40.3% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 28 | 34 | -17.6% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 15 | 19 | -21.1% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 8 | 10 | -20.0% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 3.8 | 5.3 | -28.4% |
| VRAM | 6 GB GDDR6 | 8 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 336 | 224 | +50.0% |
| TDP (W) | 54 | 75 | — |
- Arc A570M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 21% faster.
- GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q draws less power (54W vs 75W).
Verdict: GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q or Arc A570M?
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q advantages
- Memory bandwidth (+33%)
- Power efficiency (+28%)
Arc A570M advantages
- 1440p gaming (+21%)
- 4K gaming (+20%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+40%)
- Video memory (+25%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
- Choose the Arc A570M if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Arc A570M: which should you choose?
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2019, Turing) with 6 GB of GDDR6, averaging 15 fps at 1440p.
Arc A570M — Intel desktop graphics card (2023, Alchemist) with 8 GB of GDDR6, averaging 19 fps at 1440p.
GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q vs Arc A570M: Arc A570M is faster for gaming. Arc A570M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 21% faster. GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q draws less power (54W vs 75W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Arc A570M averages 19 fps against 15. At 4K (8 vs 10 fps) VRAM (6GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 54 W versus 75 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q better than the Arc A570M?
Arc A570M takes the overall edge, though GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q wins in specific areas worth weighing. Arc A570M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 21% faster.
What is the main difference between the GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q and the Arc A570M?
Arc A570M averages 19 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 21% faster. GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q draws less power (54W vs 75W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads. Choose the Arc A570M if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.