Graphics Card Comparison

GTX 1660 Mobile vs R9 280X

Verdict
GTX 1660 Mobile vs R9 280X: GTX 1660 Mobile is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricGTX 1660 MobileR9 280XDifference
3DMark Time Spy1,4941,434+4.2%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2929
Avg FPS @ 1440p1616
Avg FPS @ 4K88
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)4.34.1+4.1%
VRAM6 GB GDDR53 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)168336-50.0%
TDP (W)72250
  • GTX 1660 Mobile averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 0% faster.
  • GTX 1660 Mobile draws less power (72W vs 250W).

Verdict: GTX 1660 Mobile or R9 280X?

Our recommendation
GTX 1660 Mobile is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter.

GTX 1660 Mobile advantages

  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+4%)
  • Video memory (+50%)
  • Power efficiency (+71%)

R9 280X advantages

  • Memory bandwidth (+50%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX 1660 Mobile if you want the higher benchmark performance overall.
  • Choose the R9 280X if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
  • Choose the GTX 1660 Mobile if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.

GTX 1660 Mobile vs R9 280X: which should you choose?

GTX 1660 Mobile — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2019, Turing) with 6 GB of GDDR5, averaging 16 fps at 1440p.

R9 280X — AMD desktop graphics card (2013, GCN 1.0) with 3 GB of GDDR5, averaging 16 fps at 1440p; launched at $299.

GTX 1660 Mobile vs R9 280X: GTX 1660 Mobile is faster for gaming. GTX 1660 Mobile averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 0% faster. GTX 1660 Mobile draws less power (72W vs 250W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the GTX 1660 Mobile averages 16 fps against 16. At 4K (8 vs 8 fps) VRAM (6GB vs 3GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 72 W versus 250 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GTX 1660 Mobile better than the R9 280X?

GTX 1660 Mobile is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. GTX 1660 Mobile averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 0% faster.

What is the main difference between the GTX 1660 Mobile and the R9 280X?

GTX 1660 Mobile averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 16 fps — about 0% faster. GTX 1660 Mobile draws less power (72W vs 250W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX 1660 Mobile if you want the higher benchmark performance overall. Choose the R9 280X if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
GTX 1660 Mobile profile → R9 280X profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons