GTX 1650 Super Max-Q vs RX M 6950 XT
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GTX 1650 Super Max-Q | RX M 6950 XT | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,081 | 8,442 | -87.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 27 | 76 | -64.5% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 14 | 46 | -69.6% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 7 | 26 | -73.1% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 3.1 | 20.1 | -84.6% |
| VRAM | 4 GB GDDR6 | 16 GB GDDR6 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 448 | -50.0% |
| TDP (W) | 45 | 217 | — |
- RX M 6950 XT averages 46 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 70% faster.
- GTX 1650 Super Max-Q draws less power (45W vs 217W).
Verdict: GTX 1650 Super Max-Q or RX M 6950 XT?
GTX 1650 Super Max-Q advantages
- Power efficiency (+79%)
RX M 6950 XT advantages
- 1440p gaming (+70%)
- 4K gaming (+73%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+87%)
- Video memory (+75%)
- Memory bandwidth (+50%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GTX 1650 Super Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the RX M 6950 XT if you game at 1440p.
GTX 1650 Super Max-Q vs RX M 6950 XT: which should you choose?
GTX 1650 Super Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2019, Turing) with 4 GB of GDDR6, averaging 14 fps at 1440p.
RX M 6950 XT — AMD desktop graphics card (2022, RDNA 2) with 16 GB of GDDR6, averaging 46 fps at 1440p.
GTX 1650 Super Max-Q vs RX M 6950 XT: RX M 6950 XT is faster for gaming. RX M 6950 XT averages 46 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 70% faster. GTX 1650 Super Max-Q draws less power (45W vs 217W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the RX M 6950 XT averages 46 fps against 14. At 4K (7 vs 26 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 45 W versus 217 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GTX 1650 Super Max-Q better than the RX M 6950 XT?
RX M 6950 XT is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. RX M 6950 XT averages 46 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 70% faster.
What is the main difference between the GTX 1650 Super Max-Q and the RX M 6950 XT?
RX M 6950 XT averages 46 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 70% faster. GTX 1650 Super Max-Q draws less power (45W vs 217W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the GTX 1650 Super Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the RX M 6950 XT if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.