GTX 1650 Super Max-Q vs R7 260X
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GTX 1650 Super Max-Q | R7 260X | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,081 | 689 | +56.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 27 | 24 | +12.5% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 14 | 12 | +16.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 7 | 6 | +16.7% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 3.1 | 2.0 | +56.9% |
| VRAM | 4 GB GDDR6 | 2 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 112 | +100.0% |
| TDP (W) | 45 | 115 | — |
- GTX 1650 Super Max-Q averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 17% faster.
- GTX 1650 Super Max-Q draws less power (45W vs 115W).
Verdict: GTX 1650 Super Max-Q or R7 260X?
GTX 1650 Super Max-Q advantages
- 1440p gaming (+14%)
- 4K gaming (+14%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+36%)
- Video memory (+50%)
- Memory bandwidth (+50%)
- Power efficiency (+61%)
R7 260X advantages
- No decisive advantage on the tracked metrics.
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GTX 1650 Super Max-Q if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the GTX 1650 Super Max-Q if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
GTX 1650 Super Max-Q vs R7 260X: which should you choose?
GTX 1650 Super Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2019, Turing) with 4 GB of GDDR6, averaging 14 fps at 1440p.
R7 260X — AMD desktop graphics card (2013, GCN 2.0) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 12 fps at 1440p; launched at $139.
GTX 1650 Super Max-Q vs R7 260X: GTX 1650 Super Max-Q is faster for gaming. GTX 1650 Super Max-Q averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 17% faster. GTX 1650 Super Max-Q draws less power (45W vs 115W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the GTX 1650 Super Max-Q averages 14 fps against 12. At 4K (7 vs 6 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 2GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 45 W versus 115 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GTX 1650 Super Max-Q better than the R7 260X?
GTX 1650 Super Max-Q is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. GTX 1650 Super Max-Q averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 17% faster.
What is the main difference between the GTX 1650 Super Max-Q and the R7 260X?
GTX 1650 Super Max-Q averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 12 fps — about 17% faster. GTX 1650 Super Max-Q draws less power (45W vs 115W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the GTX 1650 Super Max-Q if you game at 1440p. Choose the GTX 1650 Super Max-Q if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.