GTX 1650 Super Max-Q vs Pro WX 9100
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GTX 1650 Super Max-Q | Pro WX 9100 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,081 | 4,301 | -74.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 27 | 49 | -44.9% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 14 | 29 | -51.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 7 | 16 | -56.3% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 3.1 | 12.3 | -74.9% |
| VRAM | 4 GB GDDR6 | 16 GB HBM2 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 484 | -53.7% |
| TDP (W) | 45 | 250 | — |
- Pro WX 9100 averages 29 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 52% faster.
- GTX 1650 Super Max-Q draws less power (45W vs 250W).
Verdict: GTX 1650 Super Max-Q or Pro WX 9100?
GTX 1650 Super Max-Q advantages
- Power efficiency (+82%)
Pro WX 9100 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+52%)
- 4K gaming (+56%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+75%)
- Video memory (+75%)
- Memory bandwidth (+54%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GTX 1650 Super Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the Pro WX 9100 if you game at 1440p.
GTX 1650 Super Max-Q vs Pro WX 9100: which should you choose?
GTX 1650 Super Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2019, Turing) with 4 GB of GDDR6, averaging 14 fps at 1440p.
Pro WX 9100 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Vega) with 16 GB of HBM2, averaging 29 fps at 1440p; launched at $1,599.
GTX 1650 Super Max-Q vs Pro WX 9100: Pro WX 9100 is faster for gaming. Pro WX 9100 averages 29 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 52% faster. GTX 1650 Super Max-Q draws less power (45W vs 250W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the Pro WX 9100 averages 29 fps against 14. At 4K (7 vs 16 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 16GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 45 W versus 250 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GTX 1650 Super Max-Q better than the Pro WX 9100?
Pro WX 9100 is the clearly stronger overall choice, winning most of the dimensions that matter. Pro WX 9100 averages 29 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 52% faster.
What is the main difference between the GTX 1650 Super Max-Q and the Pro WX 9100?
Pro WX 9100 averages 29 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 52% faster. GTX 1650 Super Max-Q draws less power (45W vs 250W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the GTX 1650 Super Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the Pro WX 9100 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.