Graphics Card Comparison

GTX 1650 Super Max-Q vs GTX 1660 Mobile

Verdict
GTX 1650 Super Max-Q vs GTX 1660 Mobile: GTX 1660 Mobile is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricGTX 1650 Super Max-QGTX 1660 MobileDifference
3DMark Time Spy1,0811,494-27.6%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2729-6.9%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1416-12.5%
Avg FPS @ 4K78-12.5%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)3.14.3-27.6%
VRAM4 GB GDDR66 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)224168+33.3%
TDP (W)4572
  • GTX 1660 Mobile averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 13% faster.
  • GTX 1650 Super Max-Q draws less power (45W vs 72W).

Verdict: GTX 1650 Super Max-Q or GTX 1660 Mobile?

Our recommendation
GTX 1660 Mobile takes the overall edge, though GTX 1650 Super Max-Q wins in specific areas worth weighing.

GTX 1650 Super Max-Q advantages

  • Memory bandwidth (+25%)
  • Power efficiency (+38%)

GTX 1660 Mobile advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+13%)
  • 4K gaming (+13%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+28%)
  • Video memory (+33%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX 1650 Super Max-Q if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads.
  • Choose the GTX 1660 Mobile if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the GTX 1650 Super Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.

GTX 1650 Super Max-Q vs GTX 1660 Mobile: which should you choose?

GTX 1650 Super Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2019, Turing) with 4 GB of GDDR6, averaging 14 fps at 1440p.

GTX 1660 Mobile — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2019, Turing) with 6 GB of GDDR5, averaging 16 fps at 1440p.

GTX 1650 Super Max-Q vs GTX 1660 Mobile: GTX 1660 Mobile is faster for gaming. GTX 1660 Mobile averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 13% faster. GTX 1650 Super Max-Q draws less power (45W vs 72W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the GTX 1660 Mobile averages 16 fps against 14. At 4K (7 vs 8 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 6GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 45 W versus 72 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GTX 1650 Super Max-Q better than the GTX 1660 Mobile?

GTX 1660 Mobile takes the overall edge, though GTX 1650 Super Max-Q wins in specific areas worth weighing. GTX 1660 Mobile averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 13% faster.

What is the main difference between the GTX 1650 Super Max-Q and the GTX 1660 Mobile?

GTX 1660 Mobile averages 16 fps at 1440p versus 14 fps — about 13% faster. GTX 1650 Super Max-Q draws less power (45W vs 72W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX 1650 Super Max-Q if you work with high-resolution textures or memory-bound workloads. Choose the GTX 1660 Mobile if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
GTX 1650 Super Max-Q profile → GTX 1660 Mobile profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons