Graphics Card Comparison

GTX 1650 Mobile vs GTX 680

Verdict
GTX 1650 Mobile vs GTX 680: GTX 680 is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricGTX 1650 MobileGTX 680Difference
3DMark Time Spy8891,137-21.8%
Avg FPS @ 1080p2527-7.4%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1314-7.1%
Avg FPS @ 4K77
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)2.53.3-21.8%
VRAM4 GB GDDR52 GB GDDR5
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)112224-50.0%
TDP (W)45195
  • GTX 680 averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 7% faster.
  • GTX 1650 Mobile draws less power (45W vs 195W).

Verdict: GTX 1650 Mobile or GTX 680?

Our recommendation
GTX 680 takes the overall edge, though GTX 1650 Mobile wins in specific areas worth weighing.

GTX 1650 Mobile advantages

  • Video memory (+50%)
  • Power efficiency (+77%)

GTX 680 advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+7%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+22%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+50%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX 1650 Mobile if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
  • Choose the GTX 680 if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the GTX 1650 Mobile if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.

GTX 1650 Mobile vs GTX 680: which should you choose?

GTX 1650 Mobile — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2019, Turing) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p.

GTX 680 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2012, Kepler) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 14 fps at 1440p; launched at $499.

GTX 1650 Mobile vs GTX 680: GTX 680 is faster for gaming. GTX 680 averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 7% faster. GTX 1650 Mobile draws less power (45W vs 195W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the GTX 680 averages 14 fps against 13. At 4K (7 vs 7 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 2GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 45 W versus 195 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GTX 1650 Mobile better than the GTX 680?

GTX 680 takes the overall edge, though GTX 1650 Mobile wins in specific areas worth weighing. GTX 680 averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 7% faster.

What is the main difference between the GTX 1650 Mobile and the GTX 680?

GTX 680 averages 14 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 7% faster. GTX 1650 Mobile draws less power (45W vs 195W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX 1650 Mobile if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work. Choose the GTX 680 if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
GTX 1650 Mobile profile → GTX 680 profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons