GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs R9 390
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GTX 1650 GDDR6 | R9 390 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,225 | 1,792 | -31.6% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 28 | 31 | -9.7% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 15 | 17 | -11.8% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 8 | 9 | -11.1% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 2.9 | 5.1 | -44.3% |
| VRAM | 4 GB GDDR6 | 8 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 224 | 448 | -50.0% |
| TDP (W) | 75 | 275 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $149 | $329 | -54.7% |
- R9 390 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 12% faster.
- GTX 1650 GDDR6 draws less power (75W vs 275W).
Verdict: GTX 1650 GDDR6 or R9 390?
GTX 1650 GDDR6 advantages
- Power efficiency (+73%)
- Affordability (+55%)
R9 390 advantages
- 1440p gaming (+12%)
- 4K gaming (+11%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+32%)
- Video memory (+50%)
- Memory bandwidth (+50%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GTX 1650 GDDR6 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
- Choose the R9 390 if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the GTX 1650 GDDR6 if you want the better price for the performance.
Value for money
GTX 1650 GDDR6 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs R9 390: which should you choose?
GTX 1650 GDDR6 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2020, Turing) with 4 GB of GDDR6, averaging 15 fps at 1440p; launched at $149.
R9 390 — AMD desktop graphics card (2015, GCN 2.0) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 17 fps at 1440p; launched at $329.
GTX 1650 GDDR6 vs R9 390: R9 390 is faster for gaming. R9 390 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 12% faster. GTX 1650 GDDR6 draws less power (75W vs 275W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the R9 390 averages 17 fps against 15. At 4K (8 vs 9 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 8GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 75 W versus 275 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $149 vs $329, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GTX 1650 GDDR6 better than the R9 390?
R9 390 takes the overall edge, though GTX 1650 GDDR6 wins in specific areas worth weighing. R9 390 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 12% faster.
What is the main difference between the GTX 1650 GDDR6 and the R9 390?
R9 390 averages 17 fps at 1440p versus 15 fps — about 12% faster. GTX 1650 GDDR6 draws less power (75W vs 275W).
Which is better value?
GTX 1650 GDDR6 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the GTX 1650 GDDR6 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise. Choose the R9 390 if you game at 1440p.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.