GTX 1630 vs GTX 770 Max-Q
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GTX 1630 | GTX 770 Max-Q | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 732 | 815 | -10.2% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 24 | 25 | -4.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 13 | 13 | — |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 6 | 7 | -14.3% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 1.8 | 2.3 | -21.5% |
| VRAM | 4 GB GDDR6 | 2 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 112 | 224 | -50.0% |
| TDP (W) | 75 | 103 | — |
- GTX 1630 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 0% faster.
- GTX 1630 draws less power (75W vs 103W).
Verdict: GTX 1630 or GTX 770 Max-Q?
GTX 1630 advantages
- Video memory (+50%)
- Power efficiency (+27%)
GTX 770 Max-Q advantages
- 4K gaming (+14%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+10%)
- Memory bandwidth (+50%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GTX 1630 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
- Choose the GTX 770 Max-Q if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
- Choose the GTX 1630 if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.
GTX 1630 vs GTX 770 Max-Q: which should you choose?
GTX 1630 — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2022, Turing) with 4 GB of GDDR6, averaging 13 fps at 1440p; launched at $169.
GTX 770 Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2013, Kepler) with 2 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p.
GTX 1630 vs GTX 770 Max-Q: GTX 1630 is faster for gaming. GTX 1630 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 0% faster. GTX 1630 draws less power (75W vs 103W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the GTX 1630 averages 13 fps against 13. At 4K (6 vs 7 fps) VRAM (4GB vs 2GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 75 W versus 103 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GTX 1630 better than the GTX 770 Max-Q?
GTX 770 Max-Q takes the overall edge, though GTX 1630 wins in specific areas worth weighing. GTX 1630 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 0% faster.
What is the main difference between the GTX 1630 and the GTX 770 Max-Q?
GTX 1630 averages 13 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 0% faster. GTX 1630 draws less power (75W vs 103W).
Which should I choose?
Choose the GTX 1630 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work. Choose the GTX 770 Max-Q if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.