Graphics Card Comparison

GTX 1070 Ti Max-Q vs R9 Fury X

Verdict
GTX 1070 Ti Max-Q vs R9 Fury X: R9 Fury X is faster for gaming

Head-to-head specifications

MetricGTX 1070 Ti Max-QR9 Fury XDifference
3DMark Time Spy2,0053,010-33.4%
Avg FPS @ 1080p3340-17.5%
Avg FPS @ 1440p1823-21.7%
Avg FPS @ 4K1012-16.7%
FP32 compute (TFLOPS)5.78.6-33.4%
VRAM8 GB GDDR54 GB HBM
Memory bandwidth (GB/s)224512-56.3%
TDP (W)81275
  • R9 Fury X averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 22% faster.
  • GTX 1070 Ti Max-Q draws less power (81W vs 275W).

Verdict: GTX 1070 Ti Max-Q or R9 Fury X?

Our recommendation
R9 Fury X takes the overall edge, though GTX 1070 Ti Max-Q wins in specific areas worth weighing.

GTX 1070 Ti Max-Q advantages

  • Video memory (+50%)
  • Power efficiency (+71%)

R9 Fury X advantages

  • 1440p gaming (+22%)
  • 4K gaming (+17%)
  • Synthetic benchmark performance (+33%)
  • Memory bandwidth (+56%)

Which should you choose?

  • Choose the GTX 1070 Ti Max-Q if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
  • Choose the R9 Fury X if you game at 1440p.
  • Choose the GTX 1070 Ti Max-Q if you want lower power draw, heat and noise.

GTX 1070 Ti Max-Q vs R9 Fury X: which should you choose?

GTX 1070 Ti Max-Q — NVIDIA laptop graphics card (2017, Pascal) with 8 GB of GDDR5, averaging 18 fps at 1440p.

R9 Fury X — AMD desktop graphics card (2015, GCN 3.0) with 4 GB of HBM, averaging 23 fps at 1440p; launched at $649.

GTX 1070 Ti Max-Q vs R9 Fury X: R9 Fury X is faster for gaming. R9 Fury X averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 22% faster. GTX 1070 Ti Max-Q draws less power (81W vs 275W).

1080p, 1440p and 4K

At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the R9 Fury X averages 23 fps against 18. At 4K (10 vs 12 fps) VRAM (8GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.

Power and value

Board power is 81 W versus 275 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise.

The verdict

Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.

Frequently asked questions

Is the GTX 1070 Ti Max-Q better than the R9 Fury X?

R9 Fury X takes the overall edge, though GTX 1070 Ti Max-Q wins in specific areas worth weighing. R9 Fury X averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 22% faster.

What is the main difference between the GTX 1070 Ti Max-Q and the R9 Fury X?

R9 Fury X averages 23 fps at 1440p versus 18 fps — about 22% faster. GTX 1070 Ti Max-Q draws less power (81W vs 275W).

Which should I choose?

Choose the GTX 1070 Ti Max-Q if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work. Choose the R9 Fury X if you game at 1440p.

Methodology

Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.

ER
EquivalentTo Research
Data & Benchmarks Team

We compile published benchmark results (Cinebench 2024, Geekbench 6, AnTuTu v10, 3DMark), manufacturer specifications and market pricing from nine regions into normalized, comparable datasets. Every figure traces to a named public source listed on each page.

Benchmark leaderboard compilationMulti-market pricing normalizationUnit & currency conversion
✓ Reviewed by EquivalentTo Editorial Review, Data Quality & Methodology.
Last updated 2026-07-01
GTX 1070 Ti Max-Q profile → R9 Fury X profile → Compare something else

Related comparisons