GTX 1060 3GB vs RX 560
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | GTX 1060 3GB | RX 560 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Time Spy | 1,379 | 913 | +51.0% |
| Avg FPS @ 1080p | 29 | 26 | +11.5% |
| Avg FPS @ 1440p | 15 | 13 | +15.4% |
| Avg FPS @ 4K | 8 | 7 | +14.3% |
| FP32 compute (TFLOPS) | 3.9 | 2.6 | +51.0% |
| VRAM | 3 GB GDDR5 | 4 GB GDDR5 | — |
| Memory bandwidth (GB/s) | 168 | 112 | +50.0% |
| TDP (W) | 120 | 80 | — |
| Launch MSRP (USD) | $199 | $99 | +101.0% |
- GTX 1060 3GB averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 15% faster.
- RX 560 draws less power (80W vs 120W).
Verdict: GTX 1060 3GB or RX 560?
GTX 1060 3GB advantages
- 1440p gaming (+13%)
- 4K gaming (+13%)
- Synthetic benchmark performance (+34%)
- Memory bandwidth (+33%)
RX 560 advantages
- Video memory (+25%)
- Power efficiency (+33%)
- Affordability (+50%)
Which should you choose?
- Choose the GTX 1060 3GB if you game at 1440p.
- Choose the RX 560 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
- Choose the GTX 1060 3GB if you game at 4K or drive a high-resolution display.
Value for money
RX 560 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
GTX 1060 3GB vs RX 560: which should you choose?
GTX 1060 3GB — NVIDIA desktop graphics card (2016, Pascal) with 3 GB of GDDR5, averaging 15 fps at 1440p; launched at $199.
RX 560 — AMD desktop graphics card (2017, Polaris) with 4 GB of GDDR5, averaging 13 fps at 1440p; launched at $99.
GTX 1060 3GB vs RX 560: GTX 1060 3GB is faster for gaming. GTX 1060 3GB averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 15% faster. RX 560 draws less power (80W vs 120W).
1080p, 1440p and 4K
At 1440p — the most common enthusiast resolution — the GTX 1060 3GB averages 15 fps against 13. At 4K (8 vs 7 fps) VRAM (3GB vs 4GB) and memory bandwidth matter more.
Power and value
Board power is 120 W versus 80 W, which affects PSU headroom, case cooling and noise. At launch MSRPs of $199 vs $99, weigh the frame-rate lead against price and power draw for your target resolution.
The verdict
Both are credible choices in the graphics card comparison space; the specification table above lays out every metric so you can weigh the trade-offs that matter to you. Pick the one whose strengths line up with how you will actually use it.
Frequently asked questions
Is the GTX 1060 3GB better than the RX 560?
These two are closely matched — the right pick comes down to which specific strengths you value and the price you actually pay. GTX 1060 3GB averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 15% faster.
What is the main difference between the GTX 1060 3GB and the RX 560?
GTX 1060 3GB averages 15 fps at 1440p versus 13 fps — about 15% faster. RX 560 draws less power (80W vs 120W).
Which is better value?
RX 560 delivers more performance per dollar, making it the better value of the two at their listed prices.
Which should I choose?
Choose the GTX 1060 3GB if you game at 1440p. Choose the RX 560 if you play the latest titles at high textures or do GPU-accelerated work.
Methodology
Graphics cards are compared on 3DMark Time Spy scores, average gaming frame rates at 1080p/1440p/4K, FP32 compute throughput, VRAM capacity and type, memory bandwidth, board power (TDP) and launch MSRP — plus AI workload throughput (Stable Diffusion iterations/s and local LLM tokens/s) where measured. Vintage and server GPUs without modern benchmark results are compared on specifications only, clearly labelled. Frame rates are averages across a game suite at high settings; specific titles vary.